data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/017cb/017cb30c47b446c1c5bc056d233f615d868f3aa5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49d65/49d6584b11462c24afa902264366780b1e07a6e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3043e/3043e4bc8fc84afb448c6fc8a5edad8d523fccd9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c9b0/0c9b0c376445083993a9ef27e556bad9dc9bd108" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29d0a/29d0aa5642560fa6c2df862b51e5931c2ba3a11e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87738/877383f6ec9adaa5c186a3e169f8a12d24387903" alt=""
Later, in 1987, Charles criticised a scheme for Paternoster Square, next to St Paul’s Cathedral, by his bete noir Richard Rogers, saying "you have to give this to the Luftwaffe, when it knocked down our buildings, it didn’t replace them with anything more offensive than rubble” and mercifully it was quickly dropped.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34eb0/34eb01edd0ee5bd174329889421fa06b59dddd40" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3cd0/b3cd068aab1810aa75895f6a3cc91ee58c1e0461" alt=""
Over subsequent years, in publications such as his 'Visions for Britain', Charles gave us his much appreciated opinion of John Madin's 1974 Birmingham Central Library as “a place where books are incinerated, not kept." While the British Library (left), by Colin St.John Wilson, was “more like the assembly hall of an academy for secret police”.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f431/3f431deb2abe9d36e84a1d35d07b1a729821ecf4" alt=""
Charles has been guided in his pronouncement in the 'Architectural Review' by his ten simple, but timeless Principles :
Architecture is :
* a language.
* must also have scale as a key.
* should have limited signage.
* have built-in flexibility,
and is about :
* developments that must respect the land.
* creating harmony where neighbouring buildings must be ‘in tune’ but not uniform.
* the creation of well-designed enclosures.
* recognising materials also matters and the use of local wood beats that of imported aluminium.
* putting the pedestrian at the centre of the design process.
* recognising that space is at a premium, but not result in high-rise builds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/515a7/515a761e7f486164f4187ff81fd5a32cdaf74a50" alt=""
Charles has also been fortunate in surrounding himself with traditionalists like :
* Quinlan Terry (left) who believes classical architecture is an expression of “divine order”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23254/23254275a05de7f2f9b3f5103ac3f44ba41af3f5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29c96/29c963f542ca155b246d66618cda92c9abf52f63" alt=""
It would be wrong to think that Charles is a Prince interested only in “turning the clock back to some Golden Age”. His thoughts and ideas about architecture are :
* about the challenges of the future : of housing the 3 billion extra people projected to be on the planet by 2050 and housing them in a sustainable, resilient manner.
* rediscovering traditional approaches to architecture, which developed over millennia and were abandoned in a so-called 'progressive' modern age.
The old Prince is at his simplest and most profound when he argues that, and it is perhaps here that the old archaeology and history graduate comes out, that architecture should :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc986/dc98631dcb7b9ba984f5a1feb79f7616e476a455" alt=""
* use the harmonic and geometrical division of circles which “displays the order which is sacred to all things.”
And Charles, who may not be a 'prince of the people' is certainly a 'prince for the people', believes that architecture using this language, this geometric grammar, “communicates directly to people by resonating with their true being”.
In this scheme, the geometric rose windows of a medieval cathedral, like Durham, are seen as “physical manifestations of the Divine order of the universe” and are inherently beautiful. This could be a paean in praise for Monarchy itself.
Britain acknowledges the fact that for more than 30 years, the good Prince may have been the bane of the architectural profession, but he has wielded, the power bestowed upon him by an accident of birth, to influence the design not only of individual buildings and projects, but the entire debate about what architecture is, who it is for and what it should look like and for this, his subjects and the country is profoundly grateful. It will certainly have no truck with Alister Scott at Birmingham City University who said : "There is clear evidence of elitism and his lack of empathy with the problems facing his peasantry".